Emmanuel Chabrier 

In 1943, Francis Poulenc, a great admirer of Emmanuel Chabrier, encouraged Roland-Manuel, already author of several works on Ravel, to write a study of the composer of Gwendoline: “What we’re missing is a good Chabrier. Only you would be able to do it. Have a think about it” (Correspondance, p. 547). At the time, as Southon points out, “existing studies of Chabrier [were] still rare and already dated” (J’écris ce qui me chante, p. 41); these included a Chabrier by Joseph Desaymard (1908), who would also publish the correspondence in 1934, and biographies by René Martineau (1910) and Georges Servières (1912). Poulenc’s initial exhortation was followed by an exchange between himself, Roland-Manuel, and Georges Poupet, an editor at Plon and friend of Poulenc, but led to nothing concrete. In 1959—despite having already made several contributions of his own, including a panegyric in the NRF (1 July 1941) on the occasion of Chabrier’s centenary—Poulenc declared to his friend Suzanne Peignot that “There are so many things that have never been said about this remarkable man” (Correspondence, p. 933). He then made up his mind to start writing this missing piece in the historiography of French music.

... read more 
genreBiography
editorLa Palatine
place of publicationParis-Genève
years of publication1961
pages187
languagesfrançais
translations
compositeur
same ashttps://data.bnf.fr/15043159/francis_poulenc_emmanuel_chabrier/